Prolegomena to Any Future Historicizing: The Dilthey-Husserl Debate and Why It Matters for Critical Phenomenology

Christopher R. Myers

Abstract


The aim of this paper is to revisit Husserl and Dilthey’s 1911 correspondence in order to develop a deeper perspective on a tendency in critical phenomenological research: the tendency to historicize lived experience. I argue for two theses: first, while both Husserl and Dilthey recognized that lived experience is always historically situated, they diverged in their approaches to the interpretation of historicity—Husserl adopting a transcendental approach, and Dilthey a hermeneutic approach. Second, while Husserl’s treatment of historicity is in tension with critical phenomenology’s commitment to historicizing the phenomenological attitude itself, Dilthey’s treatment suggests that our historicity needs to be interpreted as something that is itself socially and historically conditioned. For this reason, Dilthey’s attempt to achieve a hermeneutic conception of understanding offers insight for critical phenomenology’s treatment of the relationship between phenomenology and history.

Peer review process: Guest edited

Keywords


Husserl; Dilthey; history; historicism

References


Ahmed, Sara. 2006. Queer Phenomenology: Orientations, Objects, Others. Durham, NC: Duke

University Press.

Bambach, Charles. 2019. “Hermeneutics and Historicity: Dilthey’s Critique of Historical Reason.” In Interpreting Dilthey: Critical Essays, edited by Eric S. Nelson, 82-102. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Biemel, Walter. 1968. “Der Briefwechsel Dilthey-Husserl.“ Man and World 1(3): 428-446.

Burke, Megan. 2020. “Heteronormativity.” In 50 Concepts for a Critical Phenomenology, edited by Gail Weiss, Ann V. Murphy, & Gayle Salamon, 161-168. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Carr, David. 1974. Phenomenology and the Problem of History: A Study of Husserl’s Transcendental Philosophy. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.

De Mul, Jos. 2014. The Tragedy of Finitude: Dilthey’s Hermeneutics of Life, translated by Tony Burrett. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1960. Gesammelte Schriften VIII. Band, Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft.

Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1977. Descriptive Psychology and Historical Understanding, translated by Richard M. Zaner & Kenneth L. Heiges. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1989. Selected Works I: Introduction to the Human Sciences, edited by Rudolf A. Makkreel & Frithjof Rodi. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Dilthey, Wilhelm. 1990. Gesammelte Schriften IV. Band, besorgt von Karlfried Gründer &

Frithjof Rodi. Stuttgart: B.G. Teubner Verlagsgesellschaft.

Dilthey, Wilhelm. 2010. Selected Works III: The Formation of the Historical World in the Human Sciences, edited by Rudolf A. Makkreel & Frithjof Rodi. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Dilthey, Wilhelm. 2018. Selected Works IV: Hermeneutics and the Study of History, edited by

Rudolf A. Makkreel & Frithjof Rodi. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Dilthey, Wilhelm. 2019. Selected Works VI: Ethical and World-View Philosophy, edited by

Rudolf A. Makkreel & Frithjof Rodi. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Dilthey, Wilhelm & Grafen Paul Yorck von Wartenburg. 2020. Briefwechsel zwischen Wilhelm Dilthey und dem Grafen Paul Yorck v. Wartenburg, 1877-1897, edited by Gräfin Sigrid von der Schulenburg. Middleton: BiblioLife Press.

Ermarth, Michael. 1978. Wilhelm Dilthey: The Critique of Historical Reason. Chicago:

University of Chicago Press.

Forster, Michael N. 2019. “Dilthey’s Importance for Hermeneutics.” In Interpreting Dilthey:

Critical Essays, edited by Eric S. Nelson, 61-101. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2008. “The Science of the Life-World.” In Philosophical Hermeneutics,

edited and translated by David E. Linge, 182-197. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2008. “The Phenomenological Movement.” In Philosophical

Hermeneutics, edited and translated by David E. Linge, 130-181. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2013. Truth and Method, translated by Joel Weinsheimer & Donald G. Marshall. London: Bloomsbury Academic.

Guenther, Lisa. 2013. Solitary Confinement: Social Death and its Afterlives. Minneapolis:

University of Minnesota Press.

Guenther, Lisa. 2020. ‘Critical Phenomenology.’ In 50 Concepts for a Critical Phenomenology,

edited by Gail Weiss, Ann V. Murphy, & Gayle Salamon, 11-16. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Heidegger, Martin. 2008. Being and Time, translated by John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson. New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.

Heidegger, Martin. 2011. The Concept of Time: The First Draft of “Being and Time”, translated by Ingo Farin. New York: Continuum.

Hertog, Francois & Michael Werner. 2014. “History/Story.” In Dictionary of Untranslatables: A Philosophical Lexicon, edited by Barbara Cassin, Emily Apter, Jacques Lezra, & Michael Wood, 439-40. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Husserl, Edmund. 1970. Crisis of the European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology,

translated by David Carr. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.

_____. 1977. Phenomenological Psychology, translated by John Scanlon. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

_____. 1983. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy: First Book, translated by F. Kersten. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

_____. 1989. “Origin of Geometry.” In Edmund Husserl’s Origin of Geometry: An Introduction, translated by David Carr, 155-180. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

_____. 2001. The Shorter Logical Investigations, translated by J. N. Findlay. London: Routledge.

_____. 2002. “Philosophy as a Rigorous Science”, translated by Marcus Brainard. The New

Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy II: 249-295.

Jalbert, John E. 1988. “Husserl’s Position Between Dilthey and the Windelband-Rickert School of Neo-Kantianism.” Journal of the History of Philosophy, 26(2): 279-296.

Johnson, Galen A. 1980. “Husserl and History.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 11(1): 77-91.

Linge, David E. 1973. “Dilthey and Gadamer: Two Theories of Historical Understanding.”

Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 41(4): 536-553.

Makkreel, Rudolf. A. 1982. “Husserl, Dilthey, and the Relation of the Life-World to History.” Research in Phenomenology XII: 39-58.

Moran, Dermot. 2018. “Husserl’s Hermeneutics: From Intuition of Lived Experiences to the Horizonal Lifeworld.” In Hermeneutics and Phenomenology: Figures and Themes, edited by Saulius Geniusas & Paul Fairfield, 122-43.

Noé, Keiichi. 1992. “The Hermeneutic Turn in Husserl’s Phenomenology of Language.” Human Studies 15:117-28.

Owensby, David. 1988. “Dilthey and Husserl on the Role of the Subject in History.” Philosophy Today, Fall 1988: 221-31.

Rand, Calvin G. 1964. “Two Meanings of Historicism in the Writings of Dilthey, Troeltsch, and Meinecke.” Journal of the History of Ideas, 25(4): 503-18.

Salamon, Gayle. 2018. “What’s Critical about Critical Phenomenology?” Puncta: Journal of Critical Phenomenology 1: 8-17.

Scharff, Robert C. 2018. Heidegger Becoming Phenomenological: Interpreting Husserl through Dilthey, 1916–1925. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Smith, David Woodruff. 2013. Husserl. Abingdon: Routledge.

Weiss, Gail & Andrew Cutrofello. 2019. “Introduction.” The Journal of Speculative Philosophy 33(3): 341-8.

Weiss, Gail, Ann V. Murphy, & Gayle Salamon (ed.). 2020. 50 Concepts for a Critical Phenomenology. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

Yancy, George. 2020. “Confiscated Bodies.” In 50 Concepts for a Critical Phenomenology, edited by Gail Weiss, Ann V. Murphy, & Gayle Salamon, 69-75. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.


Full Text: PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Christopher R. Myers

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.